This is especially true at the elementary and secondary level, where about 92 percent of the funds will come from non-Federal sources. That means the Federal contribution to elementary and secondary education is about 8 percent, which includes funds not only from the Department of Education ED but also from other Federal agencies, such as the Department of Health and Human Services' Head Start program and the Department of Agriculture's School Lunch program. Although ED's share of total education funding in the U.
This targeting reflects the historical development of the Federal role in education as a kind of "emergency response system," a means of filling gaps in State and local support for education when critical national needs arise. The original Department of Education was created in to collect information on schools and teaching that would help the States establish effective school systems.
While the agency's name and location within the Executive Branch have changed over the past years, this early emphasis on getting information on what works in education to teachers and education policymakers continues down to the present day. The passage of the Second Morrill Act in gave the then-named Office of Education responsibility for administering support for the original system of land-grant colleges and universities.
Vocational education became the next major area of Federal aid to schools, with the Smith-Hughes Act and the George-Barden Act focusing on agricultural, industrial, and home economics training for high school students. World War II led to a significant expansion of Federal support for education.
The Lanham Act in and the Impact Aid laws of eased the burden on communities affected by the presence of military and other Federal installations by making payments to school districts. And in , the "GI Bill" authorized postsecondary education assistance that would ultimately send nearly 8 million World War II veterans to college. To help ensure that highly trained individuals would be available to help America compete with the Soviet Union in scientific and technical fields, the NDEA included support for loans to college students, the improvement of science, mathematics, and foreign language instruction in elementary and secondary schools, graduate fellowships, foreign language and area studies, and vocational-technical training.
The anti-poverty and civil rights laws of the s and s brought about a dramatic emergence of the Department's equal access mission. When the modification was finalized, the Department of Education is administered by the United States Secretary of Education. Although the Department of Education is a full-functioning and funded governmental organization, it remains the smallest Cabinet-level department, with roughly 5, employees.
Unlike the educational systems of other nations, education in the United States of America is decentralized the school systems are funded and run on a local level.
The federal government and its coordinating Department of Education, in the United States, is not primarily involved in determining educational standards or curricula—although this role has been augmented through the passing of the No Child Left Behind Act.
In general, however, the quality and effectiveness of an educational institution and their coordinating degrees is primarily maintained through an informal private process known as accreditation. This process is implemented and maintained by the local school district itself; in accreditation, the Department of Education has no direct public jurisdictional control. In general, as a government body, the Department of Education aims to promote student achievement and the preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access.
If you need legal advice and assistance, contact an education lawyer. Sign in. This funding, which primarily comes from taxpayer dollars, has had zero impact on test scores. It has come to the point in the United States where teachers must teach to the test in their classrooms to ensure that they can keep their job and their kids can go to a school that is close to their home. Over the past 40 years, results have stayed flat or declined in most categories, which shows just how wasteful this system happens to be.
All the country does is spend more without seeing a return on that investment, which is why there are growing calls to get rid of it. Student loans could be privatized to make them more efficient. Pell grants would likely transition over to Health and Human Services or the Interior if the Department of Education were to be abolished.
That would keep those funds locked in from the government to help with the cost of tuition. The government-backed student loans would then go into the private sector where the free market, not Congress, would get to dictate what the interest rates are for future revisions. Although such a move would have an adverse impact on those who are in default or on a repayment schedule for eventual forgiveness. Those programs could be brought along as part of the mandate.
People would receive better services with less run-around using this option. It would eliminate all centralization from the U. Community-based education tends to be more effective than centralized systems that attempt to use a one-size-fits-all approach.
The idea of not letting any children get left behind is noble, but the U. NCLB created high-stakes testing elements that punish schools who under-perform even though they have little say about who attends. That never happened. By abolishing the Department of Education, the U. Although there would still be some centralization at the state level, it would be nowhere near the issues seen at the national level.
It eliminates the bureaucracy that creeps into the educational system. There is nothing wrong with the presence of standards, but they are usually insufficient in their determination of what the actual educational experience is in the United States. Even with clearer and more rigorous requirements in place because of Common Core, there are still states that meet or exceed them right now.
Some schools would be able to get more money. Once the abolition of the Department of Education started, there would be a transition period where any remaining funding in the budget would receive distribution based on the current rules of the system.
When it is gone, then there would no longer be money tied to grants, specific behaviors, or curriculum enhancements. That means each state could increase or decreases taxes independently to manage their finances better at the local level. That means states could manage their levies through property taxes, sales tax, lottery sales, or whatever combination of funding tools they wanted to use as long as they were compliant with local, state, and national laws.
There would be less duplication in the national system. There are hundreds of different agreements that exist right now in the U. Each one has a different value assigned to it as well. That means there are multiple bureaucrats who are sending paperwork back and forth to help manage the system.
Numerous processes are duplicated with this effort. By ending the duplication in the centralized system, taxpayers could save billions of dollars each year in meaningless labor. It would also make each state answerable to their voters for their spending habits. When each community would need to be accountable for every dollar they spend on education, there would likely be much more wisdom in the transactions. It would add more diversity to the American educational experience.
The educational system in the United States is already one of the most diverse in the world. Students from around the globe have access to an almost unlimited number of choices on what and where they can study. Families can move to different communities and still enroll their children in a local school. There are online and homeschooling options to consider throughout the country as well. This diversification would increase when abolishing the Department of Education because each state could set priorities individually.
0コメント